首页
财务会计
医药卫生
金融经济
考公考编
外语考试
学历提升
职称考试
建筑工程
IT考试
其他
登录
建筑工程
Text 4 Europe is not a gender-equality
Text 4 Europe is not a gender-equality
恬恬
2020-05-20
239
问题
Text 4 Europe is not a gender-equality heaven. In particular, the corporate workplace will never be completely family-friendly until women are part of senior management decisions, and Europe’s top corporate-governance positions remain overwhelmingly male. Indeed, women hold only 14 per cent of positions on European corporate boards. The European Union is now considering legislation to compel corporate boards to maintain a certain proportion of women—up to 60 per cent. This proposed mandate was born of frustration. Last year, European Commission Vice President Viviane Reding issued a call to voluntary action. Reding invited corporations to sign up for gender balance goals of 40 per cent female board membership. But her appeal was considered a failure: only 24 companies took it up. Do we need quotas to ensure that women can continue to climb the corporate ladder fairly as they balance work and family? “Personally, I don’t like quotas,” Reding said recently. “But I like what the quotas do.” Quotas get action: they “open the way to equality and they break through the glass ceiling,” according to Reding, a result seen in France and other countries with legally binding provisions on placing women in top business positions. I understand Reding’s reluctance—and her frustration. I don’t like quotas either; they run counter to my belief in meritocracy, governance by the capable. But, when one considers the obstacles to achieving the meritocratic ideal, it does look as if a fairer world must be temporarily ordered. After all, four decades of evidence has now shown that corporations in Europe as well as the US are evading the meritocratic hiring and promotion of women to top positions—no matter how much “soft pressure” is put upon them. When women do break through to the summit of corporate power—as, for example, Sheryl Sandberg recently did at Facebook—they attract massive attention precisely because they remain the exception to the rule. If appropriate public policies were in place to help all women—whether CEOs or their children’s caregivers—and all families, Sandberg would be no more newsworthy than any other highly capable person living in a more just society.
选项
In the European corporate workplace, generally ______ . A.women take the lead B.men have the family say C.corporate governance is overwhelmed D.senior management is family-friendly
答案
B
解析
本题考查的是考生对细节信息在上下文中具体含义的理解判断能力。由第一段第一句可知,欧洲不是性别平等的天堂,以此引出职场男女比例失衡的问题。第二句表明,对家庭来说,只有女性进入决策高层,职场才可以算是完全友好的,可是在欧洲公司管理高层,男性占压倒性多数。第三句进一步以数字说明这一情况:欧洲公司董事会中,女性仅占l4%。故B项“男性最后说了算”为正确答案。A项“女性占先”与实际情况不符。C项“公司管理手足无措”,未在第一段中提及。D项“高级管理层是家庭一般友好的”也不正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://ti.zuoweng.com/ti/FHVpKKKQ
相关试题推荐
随机试题
脑脊液采集的第3管常用作 A.蛋白质测定 B.葡萄糖测定 C.免疫学检查
(97-98题共用备选答案) A.睡前服 B.饭前服 C.饭后服 D.空
上课时遇到幼儿尿裤子这种情况,幼儿教师采取以下哪种做法最为恰当?( )
强度高、耐磨损、防潮性好,用途广泛是( )的主要优点。
Hisfathertriedtoprobehismindandd
在城市用地经济评价中,确定各种地价修正系数基础的区位条件是()。 A.宏观区
下列关于价值工程原理的描述中,正确的有()。 A.价值工程中所述的“价值”是
公路隧道明洞顶的填土厚度应不小于()m。 A.1.0 B.2.0 C
下列关于各种特殊类型基金的说法,正确的是( )。A.FOF是一种专门投资于股票指数的基金B.ETF是一种跟踪“标的指数”变化的开放式基金,但其不能在交易所上市
对软膏剂的质量要求叙述不正确的是A:均匀细腻,无粗糙感B:无刺激性、过敏性C:软膏剂稠度应适宜,易于涂布D:应符合卫生学要求E:软膏剂是半固体制剂,药物