2. 建筑工程
  3. Text 3　　“There is one and only one socia

Text 3　　“There is one and only one socia

shuhaiku2020-05-20  20
问题 Text 3　　“There is one and only one social responsibility of business,” wrote Milton Friedman, a Nobel prize-winning economist, “That is, to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits.” But even if you accept Friedman’s premise and regard corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies as a waste of shareholders’ money, things may not be absolutely clear-cut. New research suggests that CSR may create monetary value for companies—at least when they are prosecuted for corruption.　　The largest firms in America and Britain together spend more than $15 billion a year on CSR, according to an estimate by EPG, a consulting firm. This could add value to their businesses in three ways. First, consumers may take CSR spending as a “signal” that a company’s products are of high quality. Second, customers may be willing to buy a company’s products as an indirect way to donate to the good causes it helps. And third, through a more diffuse “halo effect,” whereby its good deeds earn it greater consideration from consumers and others.　　Previous studies on CSR have had trouble differentiating these effects because consumers can be affected by all three. A recent study attempts to separate them by looking at bribery prosecutions under America’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). It argues that since prosecutors do not consume a company’s products as part of their investigations, they could be influenced only by the halo effect.　　The study found that, among prosecuted firms, those with the most comprehensive CSR programmes tended to get more lenient penalties. Their analysis ruled out the possibility that it was firms’ political influence, rather than their CSR stand, that accounted for the leniency: Companies that contributed more to political campaigns did not receive lower fines.　　In all, the study concludes that whereas prosecutors should only evaluate a case based on its merits, they do seem to be influenced by a company’s record in CSR. “We estimate that either eliminating a substantial labour-rights concern, such as child labour, or increasing corporate giving by about 20% results in fines that generally are 40% lower than the typical punishment for bribing foreign officials,” says one researcher.　　Researchers admit that their study does not answer the question of how much businesses ought to spend on CSR. Nor does it reveal how much companies are banking on the halo effect, rather than the other possible benefits, when they decide their do-gooding policies. But at least they have demonstrated that when companies get into trouble with the law, evidence of good character can win them a less costly punishment.
选项 The author views Milton Friedman’s statement about CSR with ______. A.uncertainty B.skepticism C.approval D.tolerance
答案B
解析作者态度题。文章第一段第一句陈述了Milton Friedman的观点，接着第二句作者提到“…things may not be absolutely clear-cut”，表明即使认同他的观点，事情也不是那么绝对，即作者对他的观点表示质疑。然后在第三句中作者用新的研究成果支撑自己的观点，由此可知，作者对于Milton Friedman关于CSR的言论持怀疑态度。A项“不确定”并不准确，作者已经表明了自己的态度，并不是对此不确定，故排除A项。C项和D项明显与作者态度不符，故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://ti.zuoweng.com/ti/O7SpKKKQ
相关试题推荐
随机试题