首页
财务会计
医药卫生
金融经济
考公考编
外语考试
学历提升
职称考试
建筑工程
IT考试
其他
登录
职称考试
The Differences in Living Standards The differences in living standards arou...
The Differences in Living Standards The differences in living standards arou...
admin
2020-12-24
57
问题
The Differences in Living Standards
The differences in living standards around the world are vast. In 1993, the average American had an income of about $25,000. In the same year, the average Mexican earned $7,000, and the average Nigerian earned $1,500. Not surprisingly, this large variation in average income is reflected in various measures of the quality of life. Changes in living standards over time are also large. In the United States, incomes have historically grown about 2 percent per year (after adjusting for changes in the cost of living). At this rate, average income doubles every 35 years. In some countries, economic growth has been even more rapid. In Japan, for instance, average income has doubled in the past 20 years, and in South Korea it has doubled in the past 10 years.
What explains these large differences in living standards among countries and over time? The answer is surprisingly simple. Almost all variation in living standards is attributable to differences in countries' productivity -- that is, the amount of goods and services produced from each hour of a worker's time. In nations where workers can produce a large quantity of goods and services per unit of time, most people enjoy a high standard of living,; in nations where workers are less productive, most people must endure a more meager existence. Similarly, the growth rate of a nation's productivity determines the growth rate of its average income.
The fundamental relationship between productivity and living standards is simple, but its implications are far-reaching. If productivity is the primary determinant of living standards, other explanations must be of secondary importance. For example, people might think that labor unions or minimum-wage laws contributed to the rise in living standards of American workers over the past century. Yet the real hero of American workers is their rising productivity.
The relationship between productivity and living standards also has great implications for public policy. When thinking about how any policy will affect living standards, the key question is how it will affect our ability to produce goods and services. To improve living standards, policymakers need to raise productivity by ensuring that workers are well educated, have the tools needed to produce goods and services, and have access to the best available technology.
What is the most important factor that leads to the rise in living standards of average people?()
选项
A.Labor unions.
B.Minimum-wage laws.
C.Rising productivity.
D.Favorable public policy.
答案
C
解析
细节题。题干:哪个是导致普通人生活标准提高的最重要的因素?利用题干关键词rise和living standard可以定位在第三段第二句,意为“生产力对人们的生活水平起决定作用,其他因素都是次要的”,所以选项C“增长的生产力”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://ti.zuoweng.com/ti/tRdQKKKQ
相关试题推荐
TheDifferencesinLivingStandards Thedifferencesinlivingstandardsarou...
TheDifferencesinLivingStandards Thedifferencesinlivingstandardsarou...
Theyhavebeenlivingunderthemostdreadfulconditionsfortwoyears.()A.appal
Heeverearnedalivingbysellingnewspaperswhenhewasachild.()A.playedB.e
At80,PeckwasstillvigorousandlivinginParis.()A.energeticB.happyC.alone
Inordertoimproveourstandardofliving,wehavetoaccelerateproduction.()A
Inordertoimproveourstandardofliving,wehavetoaccelerateproduction.()A
共用题干 TheJoyofLivingAloneMoreandmoreAmericansarelivingalone.Someli...
共用题干 TheJoyofLivingAloneMoreandmoreAmericansarelivingalone.Someli...
共用题干 TheJoyofLivingAloneMoreandmoreAmericansarelivingalone.Someli...
随机试题
下列各项中,属于金融企业的有()。 A、国有控股的担保公司 B、城市商业银行
黄连上清丸能清热通便,散风止痛。用于上焦风热所致的头晕脑胀,牙龈肿痛,口舌生疮,
社会主义的本质是()。
过量应用细柱五加可导致
溃疡性结肠炎最严重的并发症是 A.肠穿孔 B.肠梗阻 C.癌变 D.中毒
()是根据企业的实际情况而设定的最关键的指标。 A.否决指标B.暂缓指标
甲建筑公司与乙房地产开发公司产生合同纠纷,甲按照合同中的仲裁条款向约定的丙仲裁委员会申请仲裁。此后,甲乙双方达成和解协议,甲向丙仲裁委员会撤回了仲裁申请,...
以下各选项不属于工作岗位分析信息来源的是()。A:书面资料B:任职者的报告C:同事的报告D:领导的评价
客户在年初以每股20元的价格购买某一种股票,数量1000股。该股年中分红2元/股,年末价格为24元/股。下列有关客户的收益情况正确的有()。A.客户的持有期收益
某企业为环境保护税的纳税人,该企业2018年4月直接向河流排放总铅5000千克,已知总铅污染当量值0.025千克,假设其所在省公布的环境保护税税额为每污染...