首页
财务会计
医药卫生
金融经济
考公考编
外语考试
学历提升
职称考试
建筑工程
IT考试
其他
登录
职称考试
Passage 2 Scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture--the language...
Passage 2 Scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture--the language...
admin
2020-12-24
16
问题
Passage 2
Scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture--the language we speak, the values weabsorb--shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To takeone recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedlyrepresents the self: it is active when we ( "we" being the Americans in the study) think of our ownidentity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me"circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, butalso when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no suchoverlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self asautonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes onquite different functions.
"Cultural neuroscience," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Someof the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences.
For instance, it is a cultural cliche that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians payattention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split).
Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian-Americansrecruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that processfigure-ground relations--holistic context--while the Americans showed more activity in regions thatrecognize objects.
Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showeddrawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (armscrossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain′s dopamine-fueled reward circuitbecame most active at the sight of the stance--dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese--that each volunteer′s culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obviouschicken-and-egg question, but the smart money is on culture shaping the brain, not vice versa.
Cultural neuroscience wouldn′t be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only forwell-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 studyfound that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3 + 4)or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabicnumerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and planmovements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use languagecircuits. It is as if the West conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them withsymbolic, spatial freight. (Insert cliche about Asian math geniuses.) "One would think that neuralprocesses involving basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady, but they "seemto be culture-specific."
Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it′ s important to ask whether neuroscience revealsanything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it′s well known thatEast Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite.
Does identifying brain correlates of those values offer any extra insight After all, it′s not as ifanyone thought those values are the result of something in the liver.
Ambady thinks cultural neuro-science does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding,which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you incollectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push theanalysis to the level of the brain." Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differencesare--so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and thelike may be no such thing.
Which of the following is closest in meaning to the underlined phrase "making waves" inParagraph 3
选项
A.Drawing criticism.
B.Receiving suspicion.
C.Attracting attention.
D.Causing disagreement.
答案
D
解析
词义题。由画线词定位至文章第三段“Cultural neuroscience wouldn’t be making waves ifit found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences.”.意思是如果发现神经生物学仅以著名的文化差异为基础,那么文化神经科学并不会掀起风波。making waves意为“造成轰动,引起话题”,四个选项中D项Causing disagreement“引起分歧”与其意思最接近。故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://ti.zuoweng.com/ti/0MT8KKKQ
相关试题推荐
Passage2 Americanstodaydon′tplaceaveryhighvalueonintellect.Ourhe...
Passage2 Americanstodaydon′tplaceaveryhighvalueonintellect.Ourhe...
Passage2 Americansdon’tliketolosewars.Ofcourse,alotdependsonhowy...
Passage2 Americansdon’tliketolosewars.Ofcourse,alotdependsonhowy...
Passage2 Americansdon’tliketolosewars.Ofcourse,alotdependsonhowy...
Passage2 Ofallthecomponentsofagoodnight′ssleep,dreamsseemtobe...
Passage2 Ofallthecomponentsofagoodnight′ssleep,dreamsseemtobe...
Passage2 ForcenturiesinSpainandLatinAmerica,headinghomeforluncha...
Passage2 ForcenturiesinSpainandLatinAmerica,headinghomeforluncha...
Passage2 ForcenturiesinSpainandLatinAmerica,headinghomeforluncha...
随机试题
学校课程有多种类型,其中最有利于学生系统掌握人类所取得的经验和科学认识的课程是(
某设备5年前的原始成本为l00000元,5年共计折旧60000元,目前的市场
唐代和宋代都有谏官。唐代谏官由宰相荐举,主要评议皇帝得失;宋代谏官由皇帝选拔,主要评议宰相是非。这说明()。A.唐代君主的权力不受制约B.唐代以谏官削弱宰相的
患者,男,35岁,诊断为“霍乱”,收住传染病区。 入院指导时告知患者,病区的污染区是A.医护办公室B.病区走廊C.化验室D.值班室E.患者浴室
《内经》认为,寒邪人经,其性凝滞,则A.客于经络关节,经脉拘急收引B.客于脉外则血少C.客袭肌表,卫阳不得宣泄D.客于脉中则气不通
上述哪些药物同时为败毒散和血府逐瘀汤的组成部分A.当归,枳壳B.柴胡,升麻C.枳壳,桔梗D.柴胡,当归E.当归,升麻
共用设施设备一般包括()。A:电梯、天线、照明B:消防设施、绿地、道路、路灯、沟渠、池、井C:屋顶、户外的墙面D:非经营性车场车库、公益性文体设施E:楼
在控制工程项目目标的措施中,审查施工组织设计属于( )。A.组织措施B.技术措施C.合同措施D.经济措施
社会工作者吴某最近为社区内的贫困人群开展小组工作,吴某运用发展模式开展活动。下列选项中,符合发展模式的实施原则的是()。A:帮助组员学习新知识、新方法和新观点,
以区域管理为主的总分行型组织架构的特点包括()。A.总行、分行、支行设立若干履行指定职责的职能部门B.总行、分行、支行等各级机构形成垂直管理体系C.全行所